Quocalimar's Waterfall
No, I meant it as in they have every right to not respect me, they have no obligations, except a moral one.
It may lack respect but it's not disrespectful. To disrespect is to actively take an action of showing a lack of respect, to lack respect is simply that. Most people simply lack respect for all of nature, yet they don't disrespect it by littering.
I disregarded it because it had no basis while we're arguing online like this. If that person were talking to his doctor, his doctor would have to help. If here talking to some random stranger that stranger would have brushed him off, or maybe even disrespected him.
I'm eager to see where you're going with this. No you have not.
I don't. Because I can clearly look up with my eyes, that have not failed me yet, and see that it's not purple, and for them to try to convince me that it's purple is a waste of my time.
He does not call anyone an idiot without being prompted.
Wrong. If someone says the sky is purple it's not disrespectful to disregard that idiocy. ell in Lolzors' case, you're saying the sky is purple by saying anything contrary to what he claims he's here to teach us.
It's not inherently a disrespectful thing. It can be taken as such, but when you feel you are right, others have to be wrong, and he comes as if he's right, and as if others are wrong. Rarely with an air of cockiness.
Indeed. I'll give it to you that it was showy and attention grabbing, but I could probably Google it, copy it then paste it.
If they are wrong (or you think they are wrong) it's not a sign of disrespect. Where the respect comes into play is how he doesn't resort to name calling, and the like.
and your point is? lol, if they happened to find three great faces on the internet to use, more power to them.
Everyone wants to say random dude, but he's too obvious. His randomness is always contained in the package of being an ass. Joe's got that randomness that you can only expect to come from him. Doesn't sound random? Let me explain. You see a random as hell debate with a random title, and you immediately know who it's from, then you go see it, to see what randomness he posted as the first argument.
JoeCavalry
It doesn't matter how flashy the emotes, are, I could copy paste the biggest baddest, worst emote you ever saw. What matters it the memorability. No Joe argument is complete with out his wink eye faced emoted ;)
JoeCavalry
I feel like Joe's fits who he is really well, so it'd be rated est by me off of that.
JoeCavalry
Joe, every time I see a Joe debate I think well this is obvious bullshit, then there's so knowledge hidden in there, and I'm like "bwaaaah"
JoeCavalary
When he showed, Chuz-Life. Since he's gone now I can give it to the next most passionate.
Lolzors93
No one really makes an impression on me, but I guess one name that keeps coming up, that I don't disagree with.
Azra
Jc41218, he would not stop celebrating the recent trollings, and was doing exactly what you should never do when trolls come around. Feed them!
Jc41218
Toss up between the three faces I like the most.
Azra, Abby, and Lizzie.
Though since I'm bad with distinguishing actual attractiveness, I'll throw in personality, and end my vote with Lizzie.
LizziexLaura
Most people don't make challenge debates, I guess the only person who I've actually seen make one is Sitara. Buuuuut she made it as a means of getting around being banned from commenting to the person so I'd give it to her challenger, Stryker. He held his own and tried, then was banned, but still tried more.
Stryker
Everyone wants to say Srom, my question for them is why? He does not make waves, he does not convince anyone, and thankfully he is not an asshole. See if you're voting him because you like him as a person, that's cool too, just say that.
I want to say Lolzors. He gets in your face, usually has an unrelenting opinion, and still manages to stay respectful. I have never agreed with him ever but I can always expect him to keep up his point.
Lolzors93
I agree with you. I didn't mean to come off as stating the correct way to when an argument.
So you managed to prevent him from doing just that? That's a feat, what argument was it.?
I wouldn't call any debate with him a win.
The reason is because, how can you say you won a debate?
Because you presented more info?
Info that already existed.
Because you got the last word?
Well that's not really grounds for an argument, that could go on forever.
If I had to define a win, it'd be win one party learns something they didn't know, and or realizes the mistakes in what they know. Surely you didn't teach him the error of his ways, and certainly you didn't learn anything from the debate. Did you?
IDK, why not? You gotta admit, calling him religious when everyone knows he's not definitely makes for a good cover up. And Dana, if you're reading this, relax, I'm just talking about the probability that it is yours not saying that it is.
Well how specific does it need to be? And my stubbornness on one debate does not qualify as all around stubbornness. I could switch it up if I felt like it because I see an argument on each side. Yet on every debate you've been in, I've never seen you compromise, I compromise sometimes.
In Chuz's favor, if I was in an argument with someone, then some random lowbie shows up I'd be skeptical as well.
You refuse to give an inch on the abortion topic. That's indisputable.
To that paradoxes bit, i can definitely attest to that. Sometimes he gets me too, and I just feel like I'm wrong and walk away.
If you have a point, that you refuse to give an inch on, it doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, it's stubborn. Their are some noble stubborn causes, and their are some idiotic ones.
I'll just go with popular opinion here and say one of our resident, friendly trolls.
Addltd
I mean, how many of us created a site, and use that site frequently?
Lolzors93
or
ChuzLife
When it comes to unrelenting positions those two take the cake, and never share so much as a lick of icing!
Yea I agree with you. Not only do i choose her because she's nice, but because she's respectable. You must admit it's way easier to respect someone who respects you, that's her niche on this site, being respectful.
The original person I was going to choose, I could not find, then in searching tirelessly, I rediscovered another.
LittleMisfit
No one beats Chuz. If anyone has stuck to a topic, like eggs will stick to an old pan if not properly buttered, it's Chuz.
Chuz-Life
I'm kind of biased in this regard. I have to go with zephyr. That guy just knows how to argue. I've seen him on a wide array of debates, and I've never though "what the hell are you talking about". Maybe I feel I'm the same so that could be my bias though.
Zephyr20x6
Nox. We get it you're an atheist, do you have to have a war with every one who isn't though?
Nox
Lizzie, as I'm sure most will.
Will there be a least respected category. I definitely know who I'm voting for there.
LizzieXLaura
Most Logical
Most Religious
Most level headed
Most Philosophical
Most Frequent user
Most often Placed on the leader Board (or top three prizes)
Most ad Revenue bringer( if that's possible)
Most interesting debate maker
Most Popular/ New/ Controversial Debate made
Most Debates made
Longest Argument writer (not including quotes)
Most likely to respond
Users who often write long paragraphs
Most often posted videos as their argument
Most often on the winning side of debate
Most voted up arguments
Most voted down argument
Best example giver
Most poetic
Just to name a few haha
