I nominate prayerfails on the basis his only economic argument is quoting the proven disfunctional austrian economic theory.
And for the record, I don't quote rhetoric. I quote consumer side economics, which got us out of the great depression and which has created jobs every month for three years after the second worst depression in U.S. history.
... plus, economics are like 1/10 of my arguments. There 100% of prayerfails so number wise it would be him should all things be equal
Again, Austrian Economics is hardly been dysfunctional since it is one of the oldest continuous school of economic thought. This is why all Austrian economists predicted the bust of 2008 early as 2002. PredictedPredicted
They also predicted the DOT COM bubble and end of the Bretton Woods System.
What is consumer side economics? There is no such thing, the closest thing is Keynesian, which is demand side economics.
The whole thing about Keynesian Economics getting us out of the depression is laughable. The depression was caused by the expansion of credit from 1921 to 1929, and Keynesian economics prolonged the depression until 1945, and it ended because government spending and taxes were slashed.
All of arguments are not 100% economics either. More like 7/10.
i know this sounds sad, but i probably nominate myself because a lot of the debates i see in politics and some religion and other stuff i dont understand, plus i dont undersant a lot of big words:0. LOL!!!..... right, heh heh, ohhh...