Return to CreateDebate.comsnappys • Join this debate community

CreateDebate Snappy Awards


Cartman's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Cartman's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

I haven't lost it yet?

1 point

Do you have respect for me?

1 point

You don't want to know why the sky is purple to that person? No, you don't have time to show enough respect to hear what the purple sky person has to say. You just dismiss it and call them an idiot. Then they show you a purple piece of paper and tell you that the sky looks that color. But you don't care. Then the person dies and it turns out they have a brain injury and you didn't show enough respect to find out something was wrong and get them to a hospital.

1 point

It's not inherently a disrespectful thing.

Wrong, it absolutely is a sign of disrespect to not listen to what someone tells you in a debate, sorry.

It can be taken as such, but when you feel you are right, others have to be wrong, and he comes as if he's right, and as if others are wrong.

He does not claim that he is right, he claims that the only conclusion that you can draw from the Bible is his. He hasn't done any critical thinking or addressed anyones concerns.

Rarely with an air of cockiness.

Disagree.

1 point

It is a sign of massive disrespect to call me something in a completely indirect way. Why don't you show some respect for once and tell people how you feel?

1 point

It is a sign of disrespect when you make 0 effort to understand what the other person is trying to say. He calls me a sinner all the time.

1 point

I want to say Lolzors. He gets in your face, usually has an unrelenting opinion, and still manages to stay respectful.

Telling everyone they are wrong is a sign of respect? Man, I am the most respectful person on the site then. And condemning people to hell is a sign of respect, I think you are mistaken.

I have never agreed with him ever but I can always expect him to keep up his point.

So, clearly not doing a good job, so no points there.

1 point

Is it some kind of magical power you have that makes it so that any time someone says asshole you are there? Because, it is quite an impressive skill you have, :)

1 point

Yeah, I see that.

1 point

Well, I think some is implied.

Do you think that conception and roadwork are synonyms?

1 point

The definitions that you are (dishonestly) rejecting say that any coming into existence is a birth.

The word definition is a falsehood here. I have found multiple uses of the definition without the word any in it. And only your instance of the definition with the word any in it. I am rejecting it because it is a false definition.

Do you think that conception and roadwork are synonyms?

1 point

An example of your dishonesty

Half is true, half is opinion. Not dishonest.

In every way save for parturition. Absolutely. And, it's not a thought. It's a fact.

It is in fact not a fact. Birth is only a synonym for conception with respect to ideas.

I can't rule out the possibility.

According to your logic, you would say they are synonyms, but they are not.

1 point

You incorrectly believed that conception and birth were synonyms before the bogus entry that showed that Thesauruses are the most useless thing on the planet besides yourself. Just because I am wrong doesn't mean that you are right.

Do you think that birth is a synonym for conception in the context of human reproduction?

Do you think that birth and root are synonyms?

2 points

No, there is no challenge here, you have already demonstrated this lack of knowledge elsewhere.

1 point

You don't even know how a thesaurus works.

1 point

No, I think Lizzie made my case pretty clearly

So, I concluded that the explanation Lizzie gave would be yours as well. Does that make me wrong?

1 point

At least those aren't as bad as the arguments he posts that are just Bible text with no explanation.

1 point

Genius and wits usually go well with smart. You nominated OddHannah because of her knowledge on religion, how is that smart?

2 points

I asked him once to take a minute to look at how silly the ontological argument sounds. He responded in 1 minute and 47 seconds. I have to assume that there is no way a minute could have even passed from the time he read my post to the time he started his reply.

1 point

I didn't participate in the debate though, so I don't know if it was a good one.

1 point

I know, right. He even dislikes liberals, not even Democrats, but liberals.

1 point

You are insanely nice then. There are only a handful of people who miss Prodigee, and by a handful I mean 1.

3 points

Joe, he will put up conservative debates and not even care if his sources are totally ridiculous as long as the title supports him. ;)


2 of 3 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]