Well whoever that is, he didn't solicit trolls like you.

Indeed. I'll give it to you that it was showy and attention grabbing, but I could probably Google it, copy it then paste it.

No, I just wrote your name and underlined it.

If they are wrong (or you think they are wrong) it's not a sign of disrespect. Where the respect comes into play is how he doesn't resort to name calling, and the like.

and your point is? lol, if they happened to find three great faces on the internet to use, more power to them.

Everyone wants to say random dude, but he's too obvious. His randomness is always contained in the package of being an ass. Joe's got that randomness that you can only expect to come from him. Doesn't sound random? Let me explain. You see a random as hell debate with a random title, and you immediately know who it's from, then you go see it, to see what randomness he posted as the first argument.

JoeCavalry

It doesn't matter how flashy the emotes, are, I could copy paste the biggest baddest, worst emote you ever saw. What matters it the memorability. No Joe argument is complete with out his wink eye faced emoted ;)

JoeCavalry

I feel like Joe's fits who he is really well, so it'd be rated est by me off of that.

JoeCavalry

DUPPLICATE

Really?! No contest, Joe.

JoeCavalry

No offense but I have to go with:

Sitara

Joe, every time I see a Joe debate I think well this is obvious bullshit, then there's so knowledge hidden in there, and I'm like "bwaaaah"

JoeCavalary