Cartman's Waterfall
No, I was asking just to know. Look at the names we have in America. Johnson, John is a common first name. Peterson, Peter is a common first name. I was just seeing if Jungel is a normal first name. Hey, why don't you change your name to one of those? Those are way easier to spell. Johnson is pretty close to your name, you could pull it off.
Well, that totally makes sense, seeing as you are so excited about it. I was making a joke. Obviously it is normal for you to get people to call you by your correct name, whereas, it is very silly to suggest that you change your name to cater to everyone else. But, now I have explained the joke and murdered it. Poor little joke, didn't even see it coming.
You don't want to know why the sky is purple to that person? No, you don't have time to show enough respect to hear what the purple sky person has to say. You just dismiss it and call them an idiot. Then they show you a purple piece of paper and tell you that the sky looks that color. But you don't care. Then the person dies and it turns out they have a brain injury and you didn't show enough respect to find out something was wrong and get them to a hospital.
It's not inherently a disrespectful thing.
Wrong, it absolutely is a sign of disrespect to not listen to what someone tells you in a debate, sorry.
It can be taken as such, but when you feel you are right, others have to be wrong, and he comes as if he's right, and as if others are wrong.
He does not claim that he is right, he claims that the only conclusion that you can draw from the Bible is his. He hasn't done any critical thinking or addressed anyones concerns.
Rarely with an air of cockiness.
Disagree.
I want to say Lolzors. He gets in your face, usually has an unrelenting opinion, and still manages to stay respectful.
Telling everyone they are wrong is a sign of respect? Man, I am the most respectful person on the site then. And condemning people to hell is a sign of respect, I think you are mistaken.
I have never agreed with him ever but I can always expect him to keep up his point.
So, clearly not doing a good job, so no points there.
The definitions that you are (dishonestly) rejecting say that any coming into existence is a birth.
The word definition is a falsehood here. I have found multiple uses of the definition without the word any in it. And only your instance of the definition with the word any in it. I am rejecting it because it is a false definition.
Do you think that conception and roadwork are synonyms?
An example of your dishonesty
Half is true, half is opinion. Not dishonest.
In every way save for parturition. Absolutely. And, it's not a thought. It's a fact.
It is in fact not a fact. Birth is only a synonym for conception with respect to ideas.
I can't rule out the possibility.
According to your logic, you would say they are synonyms, but they are not.
You incorrectly believed that conception and birth were synonyms before the bogus entry that showed that Thesauruses are the most useless thing on the planet besides yourself. Just because I am wrong doesn't mean that you are right.
Do you think that birth is a synonym for conception in the context of human reproduction?
Do you think that birth and root are synonyms?
I asked him once to take a minute to look at how silly the ontological argument sounds. He responded in 1 minute and 47 seconds. I have to assume that there is no way a minute could have even passed from the time he read my post to the time he started his reply.
